How is it
that the experience of life is so often barren of spiritual culture for religious
people? They become stoic and stalwart, but not humble; they have keen
sight, but no insight. Yet it is not the stalwarts but the saints that judge the
world, i.e. that take the true divine measure of the world and get to its subtle,
silent, and final powers. Whole sections of our Protestantism have lost the
virtue of humility or the understanding of it. It means for them no more than modesty
or diffidence. It is the humility of weakness, not of power.
To many useful,
and even strong, people no experience seems to bring this subtle,
spiritual intelligence, this finer discipline of the moral man. No rebukes, no
rebuffs, no humiliations, no sorrows, seem to bring it to them. They have
no spiritual history. Their spiritual biography not even an angel could
write. There is no romance in their soul's story. At sixty they are, spiritually,
much where they were at twenty-six. To calamity, to discipline of any
kind, they are simply resilient. Their religion is simply elasticity. It is but lusty
life. They rise up after the smart is over, or the darkness fades away, as
self-confident as if they were but seasoned politicians beaten at one
election, but sure of doing better at the next. They are to the end just irrepressible,
or persevering, or dogged. And they are as juvenile in moral insight, as boyish in spiritual perception, as ever.
Is it not
because they have never really had personal religion? That is, they have never
really prayed with all their heart; only, at most, with all their fervour,
certainly not with strength and mind. They have never "spread out" their whole
soul and situation to a God who knows. They have never opened the
petals of their soul in the warm sympathy of His knowledge.
They have
not become particular enough in their prayer, faithful with themselves,
or relevant to their complete situation. They do not face themselves,
only what happens to them. They pray with their heart and not with their
conscience. They pity themselves, perhaps they spare themselves, they shrink
from hurting themselves more than misfortune hurts them. They say,
"If you knew all you could not help pitying me:" They do not say,
"God knows all,
and how can He spare me?" For themselves, or for their fellows, it is the
prayer of pity, not of repentance. We need the prayer of self judgement more than the prayer of fine insight.
We are not
humble in God's sight, partly because in our prayer there is a point at
which we cease to pray, where we do not turn everything out into God's
light. It is because there is a chamber or two in our souls where we do not enter
in and take God with us. We hurry Him by that door as we take Him along the
corridors of our Life to see our tidy places or our public rooms.
We ask from
our prayers too exclusively comfort, strength, enjoyment, or tenderness
and graciousness, and not often enough humiliation and its fine strength.
We want beautiful prayers, touching prayers, simple prayers, thoughtful
prayers; prayers with a quaver or a tear in them, or prayers with delicacy
and dignity in them. But searching prayer, humbling prayer, which is the prayer
of the conscience, and not merely of the heart or taste; prayer which is
bent on reality, and to win the new joy goes through new misery if need be—are
such prayers as welcome and common as they should be ?
Too much of
our prayer is apt to leave us with the self-complacency of the sympathetically
incorrigible, of the benevolent and irremediable, of the breezy
octogenarian, all of whose yesterdays look backward with a cheery and exasperating smile.
From P T Forsyth's The Soul of Prayer, pages 69-70
No comments:
Post a Comment