Sabbath was made for humankind, and for the creatures with whom we share
the world. And for people, animals and land (which is not an inert substance
but a wondrously complex living system of fellow creatures), sabbath is not
just realistic but so absolutely necessary that to ignore it is itself
unrealistic. Faithful observance of the sabbath may or may not require that
we idle a factory or a store one day a week, but it unreservedly requires
that image bearers, and every creature that can only flourish when image
bearers are properly exercising their dominion, be allowed to rest. Not to
do so is idolatry -- and idolatry, no matter how promising it seems at the
beginning, is the ultimate and greatest unrealism.
Andy CrouchPlaying
God
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Pope Francis on answers and politics
'I don't have all the answers; I don't have all the questions. I always think of new questions, and there are always new questions coming forward. But the answers have to be thought out according to the different situations, and you also have to wait for them. I confess that, because of my disposition, the first answer that comes to me is usually wrong. When I'm facing a situation, the first solution I think of is what not to do. Because of this I have learned not to trust my first reaction. When I'm calmer, after passing through the crucible of solitude, I come closer to understanding what has to be done...You can do a great deal of harm with the decisions you make. One can be very unfair.'
'Getting involved in politics is a Christian duty', Pope Francis told an audience of young students in June 2013 in Rome. 'We Christians cannot be like Pilate and wash our hands clean of things. We need to get involved in politics because it's one of the highest expressions of charity. It takes the common into consideration. Lay Christians must work in politics. That's no easy task you might say. But it isn't an easy task become a priest either! Politics is dirty but the reason it has become dirty is that Christians didn't get deeply enough involved in the evangelical spirit. It's easy to find excuses for this...but what do I do? Working for the common good is a Christian duty.'
From Pope Francis:untying the knots, by Paul Vallely, pages 131 and 139 respectively.
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Redeeming the world
We partner with God in the redemption of the world. This is not just an
issue of theology or spirituality; it is an issue of a thoroughly
reorienting missiology. It will provide God's people with a new sense of
purpose, a divine connection to daily actions. We need to grasp the fact
that in God's economy our actions do have an eternal impact. We do extend
the kingdom of God in daily affairs and activities and actions done in the
name of Jesus. We live in an unredeemed world. But out of each human life
that is given over to God and committed to his creation, a seed of
redemption falls into the world, and the harvest is God's!
Michael Frost and Alan HirschThe Shaping of Things to Come
Michael Frost and Alan HirschThe Shaping of Things to Come
Monday, January 27, 2014
Listening
The most difficult and decisive part of prayer is acquiring this ability to listen. Listening is no passive affair; a space when we happen not to be doing or speaking. Inactivity and superficial silence do not necessarily mean that we are in a position to listen. Listening is a conscious, willed action, requiring alertness and vigilance, by which our whole attention is focused and controlled. Listening is in this sense a difficult thing. And it is decisive because it is the beginning of our entry into a personal and unique relationship with God, in which we hear the call of our own special responsibilities for which God has intended us. Listening is the aspect of silence in which we received the commission of God.
Mother Mary Clare, in Encountering the Depths, pg 33.
Mother Mary Clare, in Encountering the Depths, pg 33.
Thursday, January 23, 2014
The value of small
Don't despise the small but significant symbolic act. We live still in
this modernist dream which says, "Unless you can change the whole thing,
it's not even worth trying." That's not what Jesus did. Jesus did small but
significant symbolic acts, each one of which was freighted with kingdom
meaning. God probably doesn't want you to reorganize everything overnight --
learn to be symbol-makers and storytellers for the kingdom. Learn to model
genuine humanness in your worship and your stewardship and your
relationships -- the Church's task vis-a-vis the world is to model true
humanness as a sign, as an invitation.
N.T. WrightThe Challenge of Jesus
N.T. WrightThe Challenge of Jesus
Re-imagining
What I see behind my eyes changes what I see in front of them; my
imagination shapes my perception so that I must look not once but twice at
the world to see it whole. Walking down the street, I see a wild-looking
character sitting on the steps of the library. His gray hair is matted. His
dense beard covers the slogan on his grimy T-shirt. His small darting eyes
are as volatile as a hawk's. I look once and think "drifter." I look twice
and think "John the Baptist," and in that imaginative act my relationship to
the man is changed.
Barbara Brown TaylorThe Preaching Life
Barbara Brown TaylorThe Preaching Life
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
God's safekeeping
I will lift up mine eyes, etc. In thy agony of a troubled
conscience always look upwards unto a gracious God to keep thy soul
steady; for looking downward on thyself thou shalt find nothing but what
will increase thy fear, infinite sins, good deeds few, and imperfect:
it is not thy faith, but God's faithfulness thou must rely upon; casting
thine eyes downwards on thyself, to behold the great distance betwixt
what you deserve and what thou desirest, is enough to make thee giddy,
stagger, and reel into despair. Ever therefore lift up thine eyes unto
the hills, from whence cometh thy help, never viewing the deep dale of
thy own unworthiness, but to abate thy pride when tempted to
presumption.—Thomas Fuller (1608-1661), in "The Cause and Cure of a Wounded Conscience."
Quoted in Charles Spurgeon's The Treasury of David, on Psalm 121: 1
Fuller was regarded as a witty writer, and a good selection of pithy quotes are available here.

Quoted in Charles Spurgeon's The Treasury of David, on Psalm 121: 1
Fuller was regarded as a witty writer, and a good selection of pithy quotes are available here.
Our own path
One of the hardest but one of the most absolutely necessary things is to follow our own particular line of development, side by side with souls who have quite a different one; often one opposed to our own. It is natural for youth to hesitate between an attitude which it fears may be presumptuous and a candid admission of inferiority to everything around it. But this hesitation must cease or we shall never grow up. We must be ourselves and not try to get inside someone else’s skin. David could have done nothing in the armour of Saul; he refused it and ran to fetch his sling and some pebbles from the brook. Ii was with these he slew Goliath, the symbol of the devil as the Holy Fathers taught. Still less must we look for approval and appreciation as a sign that we are on the right path. There are not so many good judges as all that, and the judgement of common opinion is far from being common sense. Good judges are so rare that St François de Sales could declare, ‘It is said that only one in a thousand is a true spiritual director. I say only one in ten thousand!’ We must therefore free ourselves absolutely of this anxious desire to be at one with other souls, however virtuous or wise they may be; just as we must never expect them to see through our eyes. We must follow our own light as though we were alone in the world, save as regards charity to others. In purely private matters, we must never be deflected from our own path. Henri de Tourville, in Letters of Direction, pages 34-5, translated by Lucy Menzies
Labels:
David,
de Sales,
de Tourville,
development,
director,
Goliath,
Menzies,
path,
soul
Doing theology in the everyday
Each of us has a theological work to do. We may think we haven’t but we can’t help it, because every time we make a decision, or refuse to make one, we are showing whether we are with Jesus or against hi. We are saying something about what we think Christianity is. There never has been a time when even the most passive could really allow a Church to make all their moral decisions for them, because the decision to obey is itself a moral decision and can have as many varied motives, from cowardice to true humility, as any other decision. Nor are the most emancipated present-day believers making their moral decisions in a vacuum. The cloud of witnesses from all ages and places surrounds them. They choose with the Church, or against it, in some sense of other, and there are many senses. So also our decisions form part of the tradition, and create the material from which others draw in making their decisions, and all these decisions depend on the kind of notions we have about what God is doing, to us and around us.Our practical decisions display theological premises, whether we like it or not. To say ‘I’m not interested in theology,’ is to display an ignorance as gross as that betrayed by people who smugly disclaim interest in politics, not knowing that every day is crammed with political acts, from greeting certain people and not others in the street, to posting letters, or buying a newspaper. Each of these acts springs from a given political doctrine, however unperceived it may be. A person may not even know the meaning of the word theology, but there is scarcely a conscious act which does not express a theological position of some kind, and even unconscious motivations often grow from the theological views of our forbears.
Rosemary Haughton, in The Knife Edge of Experience, pages 31-2.
Quoted on pages 241-2 of The Lion Christian Meditation Collection
Monday, January 20, 2014
The Jerusalem Gate
G K Chesterton in full flight writing in The New Jerusalem (pages 54/5), published in 1920. Chesterton is describing the gates of the city of the earthly Jerusalem at this point. Note that this was written after the horrors of the First World War and before the horrors that Germany inflicted on the world through Hitler and the Second World War.
...he who walks round the walls of this city...will come suddenly upon an exception which will surprise him like an earthquake. It looks indeed rather like something done by an earthquake; an earthquake with a half-witted sense of humour.
Immediately at the side of one of these humble and human gateways there is a great gap in the wall, with a wide road running through it. There is something of unreason in the sight which affects the eye as well as the reason....It suggests the old joke about the man who made a small hole for the kitten as well as a large hole for the cat. Everybody has read about it by this time; but the immediate impression of it is not merely an effect of reading or even of reasoning. It looks lop-sided; like something done by a one-eyed giant. But it was done by the last prince of the great Prussian Imperial system, in what was probably the proudest moment in all his life of pride.
What is true has a way of sounding trite; and what is trite has a way of sounding false. We shall now probably weary the world with calling the Germans barbaric, just as we very recently wearied the world with calling them cultured and progressive and scientific. But the thing is true though we say it a thousand times. And anyone who wishes to understand the sense in which it is true has only to contemplate that fantasy and fallacy in stone; a gate with an open road beside it.
The quality I mean, however, is not merely in that particular contrast; as of a front door standing by itself in an open field. It is also in the origin, the occasion and the whole story of the thing.
There is above all this supreme stamp of the barbarian; the sacrifice of the permanent to the temporary. When the walls of the Holy City were overthrown for the glory of the German Emperor, it was hardly even for that everlasting glory which has been the vision and the temptation of great men. It was for the glory of a single day. It was something rather in the nature of a holiday than anything that could be even in the most vainglorious sense a heritage. It did not in the ordinary sense make a monument or even a trophy. It destroyed a monument to make a procession. We might almost say that it destroyed a trophy to make a triumph.
There is the true barbaric touch in this oblivion of what Jerusalem would look like a century after, or a year after, or even the day after. It is this which distinguishes the savage tribe on the march after the victory from the civilized army establishing a government, even if it be a tyranny. Hence the very effect of it, like the effect of the whole Prussian adventure in history, remains something negative and even nihilistic.
The Christians made the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Moslems made the Mosque of Omar; but this is what the most scientific culture made at the end of the great century of science. It made an enormous hole...under all the changing skies of day and night; with the shadows that gather under the narrow Gate of Humility; and beside it, blank as daybreak and abrupt as an abyss, the broad road that has led already to destruction.
...he who walks round the walls of this city...will come suddenly upon an exception which will surprise him like an earthquake. It looks indeed rather like something done by an earthquake; an earthquake with a half-witted sense of humour.
Immediately at the side of one of these humble and human gateways there is a great gap in the wall, with a wide road running through it. There is something of unreason in the sight which affects the eye as well as the reason....It suggests the old joke about the man who made a small hole for the kitten as well as a large hole for the cat. Everybody has read about it by this time; but the immediate impression of it is not merely an effect of reading or even of reasoning. It looks lop-sided; like something done by a one-eyed giant. But it was done by the last prince of the great Prussian Imperial system, in what was probably the proudest moment in all his life of pride.
What is true has a way of sounding trite; and what is trite has a way of sounding false. We shall now probably weary the world with calling the Germans barbaric, just as we very recently wearied the world with calling them cultured and progressive and scientific. But the thing is true though we say it a thousand times. And anyone who wishes to understand the sense in which it is true has only to contemplate that fantasy and fallacy in stone; a gate with an open road beside it.
The quality I mean, however, is not merely in that particular contrast; as of a front door standing by itself in an open field. It is also in the origin, the occasion and the whole story of the thing.
There is above all this supreme stamp of the barbarian; the sacrifice of the permanent to the temporary. When the walls of the Holy City were overthrown for the glory of the German Emperor, it was hardly even for that everlasting glory which has been the vision and the temptation of great men. It was for the glory of a single day. It was something rather in the nature of a holiday than anything that could be even in the most vainglorious sense a heritage. It did not in the ordinary sense make a monument or even a trophy. It destroyed a monument to make a procession. We might almost say that it destroyed a trophy to make a triumph.
There is the true barbaric touch in this oblivion of what Jerusalem would look like a century after, or a year after, or even the day after. It is this which distinguishes the savage tribe on the march after the victory from the civilized army establishing a government, even if it be a tyranny. Hence the very effect of it, like the effect of the whole Prussian adventure in history, remains something negative and even nihilistic.
The Christians made the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Moslems made the Mosque of Omar; but this is what the most scientific culture made at the end of the great century of science. It made an enormous hole...under all the changing skies of day and night; with the shadows that gather under the narrow Gate of Humility; and beside it, blank as daybreak and abrupt as an abyss, the broad road that has led already to destruction.
Labels:
barbarism,
Christians,
gate,
Germans,
Germany,
Holy City,
Jerusalem,
Moslems,
Omar,
road,
wall,
war
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Delivered
We begin and end with a faith, not in Jesus simply but in His world work, not simply in His person but in His person’s office, in Him as God’s Son Christ and Redeemer, for good and all, the Conqueror and of a world worse even than we now see, the slow Regenerator of the administration of his purchased property. We begin with the faith in which our own soul calls Him its Saviour from what seems an infinite and hopeless evil. He delivers us from a sin whose guilt lies on our small soul with a pressure from the reservoir of all the high wickedness of the world. It is not from our moral lapses nor from our individual taint that we are delivered, but from world sin, sin in dominion, sin solidary* if not hereditary, yea, from sin which integrates us into a Satanic Kingdom.
From The Justification of God, pages 30-1, by P T Forsyth
* solidary: characterized by or manifesting community of interests and responsibilities [A word often used by Forsyth, though not in general use elsewhere that I know of.]
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Food
The pleasure of hiding in plain sight was just one of the benefits I
picked up from working as a cook. I learned solidarity, the kind that only
comes through shared bodily experience, sweating and lifting and hauling
side by side with others. I learned from watching customers that the rituals
of even the plainest or most cynically prepared dinner could carry
unconscious messages of love and comfort. And at the end of a rush, when I
sat down with the kitchen staff and waiters, I learned how central food is
to creating human community, what eating together around a table can do. As
a wise bishop would tell me, years and years later, in words I couldn't
possibly have grasped back then, "There's a hunger beyond food that's
expressed in food, and that's why feeding is always a kind of miracle."
Sara MilesTake This Bread
Sara MilesTake This Bread
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Love, meaningless without judgement
The holiness of God is a deeper revelation in the cross than His love; for it is what gives His love divine value. And it is meaningless without judgement. The one thing He could not do was simply to wipe the slate and write off the loss. He must either inflict punishment or assume it. And He chose the latter course, as honouring the law while saving the guilty. He took His own judgement. It was a course that produced more than all the effect of punishment, and in a better, holier way. It was vindicative and not vindictive. It re-established the holiness; it did not just confound the sinner. Expiation, therefore, is the very opposite of exacting punishment; it is assuming it. Nor is it exacting the last farthing in any quantitative sense. That is not required in a full, true, and sufficient satisfaction. The holy law is satisfied by an adequacy short of equivalency, by due confession of it and not by exaction; by due confession which fully gauges the whole moral situation, as neither sin nor love alone could do; by practical confession in an experience as holy to God as it was sympathetic to man; and by practical confession of God's holiness far more than man's guilt. What a holy God requires is the due confession of His holiness before even the confession of sin.
P T Forsyth, in The Cruciality of the Cross, pages 205-6
Saturday, January 11, 2014
The slanderer
From Charles Spurgeon's The Treasury of David, on Psalm 120:3 - what shall be given to thee? (the person who slanders).
What is the expected guerdon [reward] of slander? It ought to be something great to make it worthwhile to work in so foul an atmosphere and to ruin one's soul. Could a thousand worlds be bribe enough for such villainous deeds? The liar shall have no welcome recompense: he shall meet with his deserts; but what shall they be? What punishment can equal his crime? The Psalmist seems lost to suggest a fitting punishment. It is the worst of offences—this detraction, calumny, and slander. Judgment sharp and crushing would be measured out to it if men were visited for their transgressions. But what punishment could be heavy enough? What form shall the chastisement take? O liar, "what shall be given unto thee?" Or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? How shalt thou be visited? The law of retaliation can hardly meet the case, since none can slander the slanderer, he is too black to be blackened; neither would any of us blacken him if we could. Wretched being! He fights with weapons which true men cannot touch. Like the cuttlefish, he surrounds himself with an inky blackness into which honest men cannot penetrate. Like the foul skunk, he emits an odour of falsehood which cannot be endured by the true; and therefore he often escapes, unchastised by those whom he has most injured. His crime, in a certain sense, becomes his shield; men do not care to encounter so base a foe. But what will God do with lying tongues? He has uttered his most terrible threats against them, and he will terribly execute them in due time.
What is the expected guerdon [reward] of slander? It ought to be something great to make it worthwhile to work in so foul an atmosphere and to ruin one's soul. Could a thousand worlds be bribe enough for such villainous deeds? The liar shall have no welcome recompense: he shall meet with his deserts; but what shall they be? What punishment can equal his crime? The Psalmist seems lost to suggest a fitting punishment. It is the worst of offences—this detraction, calumny, and slander. Judgment sharp and crushing would be measured out to it if men were visited for their transgressions. But what punishment could be heavy enough? What form shall the chastisement take? O liar, "what shall be given unto thee?" Or what shall be done unto thee, thou false tongue? How shalt thou be visited? The law of retaliation can hardly meet the case, since none can slander the slanderer, he is too black to be blackened; neither would any of us blacken him if we could. Wretched being! He fights with weapons which true men cannot touch. Like the cuttlefish, he surrounds himself with an inky blackness into which honest men cannot penetrate. Like the foul skunk, he emits an odour of falsehood which cannot be endured by the true; and therefore he often escapes, unchastised by those whom he has most injured. His crime, in a certain sense, becomes his shield; men do not care to encounter so base a foe. But what will God do with lying tongues? He has uttered his most terrible threats against them, and he will terribly execute them in due time.
Labels:
David,
falsehood,
God,
lying,
psalm,
punishment,
retaliation,
reward,
slander,
spurgeon
Friday, January 10, 2014
The true Host
He has, you see, been willing to take me on as God takes me -- as a risk.
He pays me the supreme tribute of putting himself in my power.
The giver of a cocktail party is a man who hedges his bets and cops
out of the dangers of entertaining. He requires nothing of his guests
but their physical presence. If they turn out to be untempered duds or
ill-tempered boors, it is no skin off his nose: They can simply find their
own corner of outer darkness and fall apart any way they like. But
when he sits me down at his table, he declares himself willing to let me
into his own life. He puts me into my place; but he also puts me in a
position to make or break his party as I will. It is no small
boldness; if you have such friends, treasure them.
Robert Farrar CaponThe Supper of the Lamb
Robert Farrar CaponThe Supper of the Lamb
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)